Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 56 Pulse HDMI 3xDP 8GB

Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 56 Pulse HDMI 3xDP 8GB

  • Graphics processor: Radeon RX Vega 56
  • Memory capacity: 8GB
  • Memory type: HBM2
Save this product to a list
Notify me when the price drops
Price alert
Compare to other products
Compare

Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 56 Pulse HDMI 3xDP 8GB

Save this product to a list
Notify me when the price drops
Compare to other products

4.4 of 5 stars

Based on 4 reviews

Sorted by date
14/06/2019
Edited 24/07/2019
N
Nevan
Good card, at max load the temperature is 70 C which is surprisingly good for Vega cards. Then you can also overclock which gives even better performance. Edit: Has now overclocked core to 1652 MHz (1600 in reality) and HBM to 900 MHz with the voltage of 1050 etc. Am a little dissatisfied with the acoustic to keep the card at 70 C with OCn. However, the performance-elevated is good.

Google

09/07/2019
3
3dfx_Interactive
WOW for 3100: - you get unbeatable fps / crown with this, yes the card has a few years in the neck and is a little stunted - but who cares. It delivers. Performs the snap better than 1660t and has 8gb of RAM. Watched this and slightly undervolved it pulls away even more towards 1070ti territory. I refuse to pay any price for the RX 5700 and SUPER, make your voice heard and refuse and now say enough price increases on the GPUs are enough! Buy this.

Google

22/05/2019
r
reeseth
2019-05-21. Thought to wait for Navi. But for 3090: - on the Netonnet I am pretty happy. The card actually performs better than I expected. Now I play at 1080p 144hz with an Intel core i5 gene 4. Allowed an hour to adjust down the volume and run a few rounds of benchmark. Then it is fine and stable just below 70c. With core fixed at 1600MHz. No dips at all on the core. The memory was Samsung and running it at 950MHz.

Google

02/12/2018
Edited 04/03/2019
J
Jarvile
Went to this from a Strix 1070 ti and intends to start from it. Purchased from overclockersuk for 3900kr incl. shipping Runs a subvolt of -150 mV and overclocked the memory to 980mhz (Hynix, Warning that this seems to be among the top 1% of Hynix HBM2, Samsung still performs a bit better per mhz), core at about 1570mhz, + 50% power limit ( never goes above 10%). With stock settings, the core throttles due to the 180w power limit, by undervolting the core speed boost correctly to higher numbers. About the same to 10% better performance than an overclocked 1070t (2050mhz core, 9000mhz mem). Similar power consumption around 220w with similar temperatures and sound levels for both cards. + Reasonably good game-bundle even if the games are not released yet. + Driver UI, Nvidia's UI feels ancient in comparison. + Features in drivers such as overclocking, radeon chill, fan control etc. + No need to log in to Geforce Experience to get some features. + Zero case, the card is completely straight in my chassis. - Need to manually undervolve to get good perf / watt. - Nvidia's NVENC codec has much higher quality than AMD's own capture codec. Star off because the card does not have good perf / watt without spending 30min by undermining the core and overclocking the memory, which however AMD has done quite easily with its drivers. Overall satisfied with the change from a 1070 to Vega 56. A few months later: Nvidia now has support for freesync and the 2060n has similar performance with lower power consumption with 2GB less VRAM. AMD has released support for tighter memory timings (+ 7% performance for my card). As an ordinary person: Look mainly at the selection of rtx 2060 cards when Vega 56 will lie behind without overclocking the memory and undervolving the core voltage. If you like to "think" with your card then AMD still has much more freedom for this.

Google